打印

作者

Bing-Bing Zhou;Jianguo Wu;John M. Anderies

来源

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,Vol.189,Issue1,P.274-284

语言

英文

关键字

Sustainable landscapes;Landscape sustainability;Sustainability science;Landscape ecology;Landscape sustainability science;Unsustainability syndromes

作者单位

School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA;Center for Human-Environment System Sustainability (CHESS), Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA;Center for Human-Environment System Sustainability (CHESS), Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

摘要

Landscape scientists have increasingly studied sustainability during the past three decades, with a plurality of perspectives and methods. However, a comprehensive review of the relevant literature is still lacking. Two concepts capture the core of these studies: sustainable landscapes (SL) and landscape sustainability (LS). Here we present a bibliometric analysis of 333 English papers published in SCI journals (i.e., indexed by Web of Science) during 1990–2017, whose titles, abstracts or keywords contain SL, LS, or both. Using multiple methods, including change-point detection, text and topic mining, and citation analysis, we found: (1) Sustainability studies of landscapes have entered a rapid growth phase since 2004–2006, as determined statistically by the annual publications and citations; (2) There have been many more studies focusing on the ecological and practical dimensions than sociocultural and theoretical dimensions; and (3) Influenced by advances in sustainability research in a broader science context, studies of SL and LS have become increasingly holistic, transdisciplinary, and normative. Our findings suggest that, to further advance landscape sustainability science, scholars need to be more explicit about the underlying sustainability perspective and associated scales of key terms (e.g., SL, LS, and ecosystem services) in specific studies, and need to put more emphasis on place-based case studies of various landscape unsustainability syndromes by integrating the sustainability science-based social-ecological systems and transdisciplinary perspectives.