The ‘Collaborative Planning Turn’ in China: Exploring three decades of diffusion, interpretation and reception in Chinese planning

《The ‘Collaborative Planning Turn’ in China: Exploring three decades of diffusion, interpretation and reception in Chinese planning》

打印

关键字: Transnational flow of planning ideas;Travelling ideas;Chinese urban planning;Innovation diffusion;Theory and practice

作者单位: Department of Regional and Urban Planning, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, China;Department of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China;Chongqing Liangjiang Collaborative Innovation Zone Construction Investment Development Co., Ltd., China;Department of Regional and Urban Planning, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, China;Department of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China;Chongqing Liangjiang Collaborative Innovation Zone Construction Investment Development Co., Ltd., China

摘要: The collaborative planning idea (CPI) received wide attention from Chinese academics and planners when it was introduced in the late 1990s. The ongoing socio-economic transition in China has provided a fertile ground to accept, accommodate and develop CPI, exemplifying a transnational flow of planning ideas from the Anglosphere towards the non-English-speaking world. While the reception of CPI in China initiated three decades ago, the diffusion, interpretation, reception, and impacts of it are as yet understudied. To fill this gap, this article adopts a three-part step analysis: diffusion, interpretation and reception (in practice). Though inspired by Western scholars such as Healey and Innes, Chinese scholars may also be influenced by the unique governance context of China, as well as their own research backgrounds and interests, as they seek to (re)conceptualise CPI within a Chinese context, and therefore, specific interpretations of CPI in China mark distinctions from original works (e.g. mixing up collaborative planning and communicative planning and over-emphasising public participation). In practice, CPI is more operational at the macro- and micro-level non-statutory planning rather than meso-level statutory planning. However, recent attempts have been made to institutionalise CPI and facilitate the potential of extending the collaborative approach into statutory planning or beyond the realm of traditional planning.