打印

作者

来源

URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH,Vol.39,Issue1,P.48-62

语言

英文

关键字

Public housing,security,renewal,tenancy law

作者单位

Senior Research Fellow, City Futures Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia

摘要

The current imperative to renew public housing buildings and estates in NSW and other Australian states challenges the usual view of public housing as a secure tenure. An historical examination of representations about security in public housing shows, however, that this association lacks a deep legal basis. The paper then examines the extent to which the different types of current renewal activities may be legally contested in the name of security. Concluding that current laws close off contestation of renewal decisions and termination proceedings, the paper calls for legal and policy reforms to renew the security of public housing.摘要在新南威尔士州和其他澳大利亚州，当前更新公共住房建筑和地产的必要性，挑战了人们通常认为公共住房是一种有保障的使用权的观点. 然而，对有关公共住房保障的陈述的历史考察表明，这个协会缺乏深厚的法律基础. 然后，本文考察了目前不同类型的更新活动可能在多大程度上以担保的名义受到法律上的质疑. 在总结现行法律终止续期决定和终止程序的争议后，该文件呼吁进行法律和政策改革，以更新公共住房保障.KEYWORDS: Public housingsecurityrenewaltenancy lawAcknowledgmentsA version of this paper was presented at the symposium, ‘ReVision: Strategies for Renewing Apartment Buildings and Neighbourhoods in the Pacific Rim’, hosted by Kushu University and UNSW Sydney at Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, 25-29 November 2019. The author gratefully acknowledges the symposium hosts and the participants who commented on the paper. Thanks too to the two anonymous reviewers of the present paper.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).