打印

作者

来源

URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH,Vol.39,Issue1,P.1-15

语言

英文

关键字

Urban,Housing,Social Housing,Pathways,Linked-Administrative data,Longitudinal

作者单位

a Healthy Cities Research Group, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

摘要

This paper presents a national analysis of urban housing pathways. Focussing on the social housing sector, we follow social housing tenants as they move into, out of, and remain in, the sector over 15 years. Utilising a linked actuarial dataset, the paper reveals a typology of pathways, and examines the relationship between housing pathways and the receipt of broader government welfare. We find that not only is there no one social housing pathway in Australia; at different times in a household’s housing career, social housing may be used by them as a momentary stepping-stone, a safety net, or a springboard.摘要本文对城市住房路径进行了全国性分析. 我们专注于社会住房部门跟踪社会住房承租人在15年内搬进搬出和留在该部门. 利用一个关联的精算数据集本文揭示了路径的类型并检验了住房路径与获得更广泛的政府福利之间的关系. 我们发现在澳大利亚不仅没有一条社会住房途径在家庭住房生涯的不同时期社会住房可能被他们用作一个暂时的踏脚石安全网或跳板.KEYWORDS: UrbanHousingSocial HousingPathwaysLinked-Administrative dataLongitudinalDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute [3119901]; Australian Research Council [FT150100131].