打印

作者

来源

URBAN GEOGRAPHY,Vol.41,Issue10,P.1335-1343

语言

英文

关键字

Climate futures,densification,scale,ecomodernism,degrowth

作者单位

a Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK

摘要

In the face of climate destabilizations and breakdowns, debates about (de)growth and scale have been particularly significant within critical scholarship. These debates counterpose radically different political positionings, with implications for how the planetary future is envisioned. Must societies build their way out of climate change’s existential threat via massive new investments in techno-infrastructural (re)development? Or are these visions fatally flawed, requiring altogether different programs of degrowth, techno-skeptical reimagination, and decentralization? We argue that disputes about scale and “descaling” for climate action require a better theory of the urban, especially in relation to density and processes of densification. We must trouble both the (over)sell of urban density and eco-efficiencies as a response to climate change, while also pushing against the persistent anti-urbanism in much thinking around descaling, decentralization, and relocalization. Ultimately, we argue that disputes about scale within climate action need more thorough grounding in actually existing geographies and their politics.KEYWORDS: Climate futuresdensificationscaleecomodernismdegrowthDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.