打印

作者

来源

CITIES,Vol.60,IssueA,P.301-313

语言

英文

关键字

CITIES; PRINCIPLES; FUTURE; TOOLS

作者单位

[Lynch, Amyl] Ohio Univ, Dept Geog, 122 Clippinger Labs,1 Ohio Univ, Athens, OH 45701 USA. [Mosbah, Simon M.] US Advisory Serv, WSP Parsons Brinckerhoff, 1015 Half St SE,Suite 650, Washington, DC 20003 USA. Lynch, A (reprint author), Ohio Univ, Dept Geog, 122 Clippinger Labs,1 Ohio Univ, Athens, OH 45701 USA. E-Mail: lyncha@ohio.edu; smosbah@design.upenn.edu

摘要

Indicator systems help organizations worldwide to understand their progress toward sustainability. But few systems include measures of the built environment, the primary area of agency for local planners seeking to contribute to sustainability. This paper uses the U.S. as a case study to explore the challenges of, and prospects for, filling that gap. Its main questions are: 1) Can a scan of existing built environment indicators yield a catalog of high quality indicators that measure sustainability comprehensively? and 2) What gaps and challenges arise and how can they be overcome? The study triangulates answers through a review of sustainability literature, a scan of existing indicators, and consultation with panels of indicator experts. Results suggest that U.S. built-environment indicators do not robustly track local progress toward sustainability, confirm deficiencies in the equity dimension, and provide recommendations that allow communities in the U.S. and internationally to more successfully track their local progress toward sustainability goals. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.