《Can low-carbon urban development be pro-poor? The case of Kolkata, India》

打印
作者
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION,Vol.29,Issue1,P.139-158
语言
英文
关键字
climate change; co-benefits; energy; health; mitigation; pro-poor; urban development; COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPTATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WASTE MANAGEMENT; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; AIR-POLLUTION; CITIES; RESILIENCE; EMISSIONS; TRANSPORT; FRAMEWORK
作者单位
[Colenbrander, Sarah] Int Inst Environm & Dev, Human Settlements Grp, London, England. [Colenbrander, Sarah; Gouldson, Andy; Hall, Stephen; Mcanulla, Faye] ESRC Ctr Climate Change Econ & Policy, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England. [Gouldson, Andy; Kerr, Niall; Hall, Stephen; Mcanulla, Faye] Univ Leeds, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England. [Roy, Joyashree; Sarkar, Sayantan; Ghatak, Amrita; Chakravarty, Debalina; Ganguly, Diya] Jadavpur Univ, Global Change Programme, Kolkata, India. [Sarkar, Sayantan] Natl Univ Singapore, NUS Environm Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore. [Ghatak, Amrita] Gujarat Inst Dev Res, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India. [Chakravarty, Debalina] Natl Inst Technol, Jamshedpur, Bihar, India. Colenbrander, S (reprint author), Int Inst Environm & Dev, 80-86 Grays Inn Rd, London WC1X 8NH, England. E-Mail: sarah.colenbrander@iied.org; a.gouldson@leeds.ac.uk; joyashreeju@gmail.com; N.Kerr@leeds.ac.uk; eriss@nus.edu.sg; S.Hall@leeds.ac.uk; andrew.sudmant@gmail.com; amritaeconomics@gmail.com; c.debalina85@gmail.com; diya.ganguly5@gmail.com; F.E.McAnulla@leeds.ac.uk
摘要
Fast-growing cities in the global South have an important role to play in climate change mitigation. However, city governments typically focus on more pressing socioeconomic needs, such as reducing urban poverty. To what extent can social, economic and climate objectives be aligned? Focusing on Kolkata in India, we consider the economic case for low-carbon urban development, and assess whether this pathway could support wider social goals. We find that Kolkata could reduce its energy bill by 8.5 per cent and greenhouse gas emissions by 20.7 per cent in 2025, relative to business-as-usual trends, by exploiting readily available, economically attractive mitigation options. Some of these measures offer significant social benefits, particularly in terms of public health; others jeopardize low-income urban residents' livelihoods, housing and access to affordable services. Our findings demonstrate that municipal mitigation strategies need to be designed and delivered in collaboration with affected communities in order to minimize social costs and - possibly - achieve transformative change.