打印

作者

来源

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL,Vol.59,P.110-117

语言

英文

关键字

China; Air pollution; Inverted quarantine: Individualization; Health risk; CHINA; CONSUMPTION; CONSUMER; POLITICS; ECONOMY

作者单位

[Johnson, Thomas] Univ Sheffield, Dept Polit, Northumberland Rd, Sheffield S10 3TU, S Yorkshire, England. [Mol, Arthur P. J.] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Environm Policy Grp, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands. [Zhang, Lei; Yang, Shuai] Renmin Univ China, Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Beijing, Peoples R China. Johnson, T (reprint author), Univ Sheffield, Dept Polit, Northumberland Rd, Sheffield S10 3TU, S Yorkshire, England. E-Mail: Thomas.R.Johnson@sheffield.ac.uk; arthur.mol@wur.nl; leizhang66@ruc.edu.cn; fengyujianren@ruc.edu.cn

摘要

Although poor air quality has been a fact of life for millions of Chinese citizens for at least two decades, individual actions to alleviate the impact of air pollution are a more recent phenomenon. Anecdotal evidence suggests that individualized responses to environmental risks and threats, which Andrew Szasz (2007) termed "inverted quarantine," are becoming increasingly common in China. However, there is little indication about how far inverted quarantine prevails. To address this gap, in 2015 we surveyed over 1000 Beijing residents into strategies for coping with air pollution. The results are partly consistent with other findings in relation to food safety, providing further evidence of the prevalence of inverted quarantine in response to public health risks in contemporary China. Our empirical evidence also shows public skepticism about the efficacy of individualized solutions to ambient air pollution. Without a serious preventive alternative, inverted quarantine is, at best, a temporary expedient. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.