打印

作者

来源

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL,Vol.60,P.91-100

语言

英文

关键字

Creative class theory; Determinants; Amenities; Social tolerance; Economic drivers; Exploratory spatial data analysis; Creative class agglomeration; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION CHOICE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; GROWTH; AMENITIES; DIVERSITY; ECONOMY; PREFERENCES; WORKE

作者单位

[You, Heyuan; Bie, Chenmeng] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Adm, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. You, HY (reprint author), 18 Xueyuan St, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. E-Mail: youheyuan@gmail.com

摘要

The Creative Class Theory proposed by Richard Florida has captured widespread attention from international scholars and political community. From a geographical perspective, this paper employs spatial regression and variances partitioning to examine the determinants of creative class agglomeration (CCG) and its spatiotemporal dynamics, using a typical knowledge city (Shenzhen) in China. Aggregated data are collected at district level in 2000 and 2010. In particular, creative class is categories into two subgroups: creative professionals (CP) and super creative core (SCC). In particular, CCG is measured by the total share of creative class within one district. Potential determinants are described from three aspects: amenities, social tolerance and openness, and economic incentives. Results show that the three categories of determinants all have significant influences on CP and SCC agglomeration. However, the relative importance of determinants differs with the creative class sub-groups and differs with time. The 'social tolerance and openness' determinants have the strongest influence on SCC agglomeration in 2000, while the 'economic incentives' determinants have the greatest influence in 2010. For CP agglomeration, the relative importance of 'amenities' determinants is highest in 2000, but 'economic incentives' determinants have the strongest influence in 2010. 'Economic incentives' determinants also have the biggest influence on both CP changes and SCC changes during the study period. It is suggested that urban policies should not particularly emphasize the attraction power of amenities in fostering creative capital. In addition, the urban policy makers should place continuous investment and long-term focus on a diversity of relevant location factors, such as amenities, housing, education, social atmosphere. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.