打印

作者

来源

CITY & COMMUNITY,Vol.17,Issue2,P.330-349

语言

英文

关键字

CITY; CULTURE; PLACE

作者单位

[Hunter, Marcus Anthony] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Sociol & African Amer Studies, African Amer Studies, Los Angeles, CA USA. [Loughran, Kevin] Rice Univ, Dept Sociol, POB 1892, Houston, TX 77251 USA. [Fine, Gary Alan] Northwestern Univ, Dept Sociol, Sociol, Evanston, IL 60208 USA. Loughran, K (reprint author), Rice Univ, Dept Sociol, POB 1892, Houston, TX 77251 USA. E-Mail: k.loughran@rice.edu

摘要

Facing economic changes and disinvestment, powerful actors in post-World War II American cities attempted to define the city as a space of public culture to confront demographic shifts, suburban growth, and the breakdown of community. Some civic actors, especially in older Eastern cities, looked to a nostalgic and heroic past where a theme of American identity became salient as a result of the Cold War and rapid cultural and economic changes in the postwar era. To achieve urban growth, elites argued for urban redevelopment policies based on historical themes and imagery. We examine the sociopolitical history of Philadelphia's Independence Hall redevelopment project (1948-1959) and the development of the adjacent Society Hill neighborhood (1959-1964). We offer the framework of memory politicspolitical contests over the use of shared community historyto examine how growth coalitions implement plans for economic growth, tourism, and civic allegiance. Philadelphia, particularly during the postwar era, exemplifies how heritage, politics, and place dynamically collide and direct urban development.