打印

作者

来源

ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION,Vol.30,Issue1,P.175-190

语言

英文

关键字

community savings; co-production; informal settlements; investment; municipal finance; urban development; URBAN INFORMALITY; POOR; SANITATION; COPRODUCTION; URBANIZATION; PROGRAM; AFRICA; EXPERIENCES; CHALLENGES; REDUCTION

作者单位

[Shand, Wayne] Univ Manchester, Global Dev Inst, Manchester, Lancs, England. [Colenbrander, Sarah] IIED, Human Settlements Grp, London, England. [Colenbrander, Sarah] ESRC Ctr Climate Change Econ & Policy, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England. Shand, W (reprint author), Univ Manchester, Global Dev Inst, Manchester, Lancs, England. E-Mail: wayne.shand@manchester.ac.uk; sarah.colenbrander@iied.org

摘要

Global conversations around financing urban development typically neglect the importance of coordinating the activities of different stakeholders behind a shared vision for their city. In particular, low-income and other marginalized groups must be seen as entrepreneurs and partners in service delivery to enhance the efficacy of resource use and to reduce poverty. This paper explores the creation of non-traditional business models and alliances to invest in informal settlements. It presents examples from India, Kenya, Pakistan, Thailand and Zimbabwe, where local authorities, commercial banks and other formal actors have co-financed and co-delivered urban plans, housing and infrastructure through collaborations with organized groups of the urban poor. These groups make three critical contributions: financial resources, detailed information on the composition of informal settlements, and capabilities for collective decision-making and action. These contributions are underpinned by the financial and social capital developed through collective saving, and enable the delivery of complex urban improvements at scale.