打印

作者

来源

URBAN EDUCATION,Vol.53,Issue4SI,P.473-502

语言

英文

关键字

participatory action research; activist-scholarship; community engaged research; research methods; activism; social; urban; social policy; social justice; COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY; PRIVILEGE; DILEMMAS; CIRCUITS; FEMINIST; VIOLENCE; YOUTH

作者单位

[Sandwick, Talia; Greene, Andrew Cory] CUNY, Grad Ctr, Crit Psychol, New York, NY 10016 USA. [Fine, Michelle] CUNY, Grad Ctr, Crit Psychol Womens Studies Amer Studies & Urban, New York, NY 10016 USA. [Torre, Maria Elena] CUNY, Grad Ctr, Crit Psychol & Urban Educ, New York, NY 10016 USA. [Stoudt, Brett G.] John Jay Coll Criminal Justice, Dept Psychol, Gender Studies Program, New York, NY USA. [Patel, Leigh] Univ Calif Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521 USA. Sandwick, T (reprint author), CUNY, Grad Ctr, Dept Psychol, 365 Fifth Ave,6th Floor, New York, NY 10016 USA. E-Mail: tsandwick@gradcenter.cuny.edu

摘要

This essay reflects on the promise and challenges of community-engaged, critical participatory action research (CPAR) hinged to social policy in times of racialized state violence and massive community resistance. With cautious optimism, we argue for the potential of CPAR to facilitate more just social policy, by enhancing research validity, policy integrity, and organizing capacity. Drawing on a series of CPAR projects, we also raise a series of ethical, political, and power-laden dilemmas we have encountered in this work and offer, with humility, provisional solutions for advancing activist-scholarship linked in struggle with communities under siege.