Shantytown redevelopment projects: State-led redevelopment of declining neighbourhoods under market transition in Shenyang, China

《Shantytown redevelopment projects: State-led redevelopment of declining neighbourhoods under market transition in Shenyang, China》

打印

作者

来源: CITIES,Vol.73,P.106-116

语言: 英文

关键字: Shantytown redevelopment; Declining neighbourhoods; Market transition; Governance; Demolition; China; URBAN REDEVELOPMENT; GROWTH COALITION; HOUSING REFORM; SOCIAL MIX; GENTRIFICATION; SHANGHAI; LAND; CITY; RELOCATION; RENEWAL

作者单位: [Li, Xin; Kleinhans, Reinout; van Ham, Maarten] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, OTB Res Built Environm, POB 5043, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands. [Li, Xin] Chinese Acad Sci, Northeast Inst Geog & Agroecol, Shengbei St 4888, Changchun 130102, Jilin, Peoples R China. [van Ham, Maarten] Univ St Andrews, Sch Geog & Geosci, Irvine Bldg,North St, St Andrews KY16 9AL, Fife, Scotland. Li, X (reprint author), Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, OTB Res Built Environm, POB 5043, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.; Li, X (reprint author), Chinese Acad Sci, Northeast Inst Geog & Agroecol, Shengbei St 4888, Changchun 130102, Jilin, Peoples R China. E-Mail: xli-6@tudelft.nl; RJ.Kleinhans@tudelft.nl; m.vanham@tudelft.nl

摘要: Since 1978, market transition in China has significantly influenced the roles of the state, the market and the residents in urban restructuring. Since 2008, the central government has initiated Shantytown Redevelopment Projects (SRPs) to improve the living conditions of low-income residents. Between 2008 and 2012, about 12.6 million households were involved in SRPs, and forced to move as their dwellings were demolished. This paper investigates how SRPs are implemented by revealing how different stakeholders interact in SRPs in the city of Shenyang, China. Through in-depth interviews with various stakeholders and analysis of policy documentation on SRPs, the paper reveals a complex interplay between different stakeholders, which is characterized by the centralization of the inception of SRPs, the decentralization of actual SRP implementation, changes in the role of market forces, and decreasing housing affordability and multiple deprivation of residents in SRP target areas. Various stakeholders have consensus on the need for improving the living conditions in deprived neighbourhoods and on boosting the housing market. However, conflicts arise due to frictions between the central and local governments regarding the implementation of SRPs. We also find evidence of an entrepreneurial paradox in the relationship between local governments and developers. Finally, a mismatch occurs between the scope of the SRP policy and residents' attempts to improve their socioeconomic situation.