打印

作者

来源

URBAN EDUCATION,Vol.53,Issue4SI,P.503-531

语言

英文

关键字

research ethics; action research; activist scholarship; activism; social; urban; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; COLONIALITY; MISEDUCATION; EDUCATION

作者单位

[Glass, Ronald David] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Philosophy Educ, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA. [Glass, Ronald David] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Ctr Collaborat Res Equitable Calif, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA. [Sabati, Sheeva] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Educ, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA. [Morton, Jennifer M.] CUNY City Coll, Philosophy, New York, NY USA. [King, Joyce E.] Georgia State Univ, Coll Educ & Human Dev, Urban Teaching Learning & Leadership, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA. [Krueger-Henney, Patricia] Univ Massachusetts, Urban Educ Leadership & Policy Studies Doctoral P, Boston, MA 02125 USA. [Moses, Michele S.] Univ Colorado, Educ, Boulder, CO 80309 USA. [Richardson, Troy] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY USA. Glass, RD (reprint author), Univ Calif Santa Cruz, McHenry 3122 EDUC,1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA. E-Mail: rglass@ucsc.edu

摘要

This multivocal essay engages complex ethical issues raised in collaborative community-based research (CCBR). It critiques the fraught history and limiting conditions of current ethics codes and review processes, and engages persistent troubling questions about the ethicality of research practices and universities themselves. It cautions against positioning CCBR as a corrective that fully escapes these issues. The authors draw from a range of philosophic, African-centric, feminist, decolonial, Indigenous, and other critical theories to unsettle research ethics. Contributors point toward research ethics as a praxis of engagement with aggrieved communities in healing from and redressing historical trauma.