打印

作者

来源

JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE,Vol.33,Issue1,P.31-44

语言

英文

关键字

gentrification; displacement; neighborhood change; transportation; demographic analysis; gender/race/ethnicity; real estate; infrastructure and capital facilities; NEW-YORK-CITY; RAIL TRANSIT; RESIDENTIAL-MOBILITY; UNEVEN DEVELOPMENT; PROPERTY-VALUES; NEI

作者单位

[Zuk, Miriam] Univ Calif Berkeley, Ctr Community Innovat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA. [Chapple, Karen] Univ Calif Berkeley, City & Reg Planning, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA. [Bierbaum, Ariel H.] Univ Maryland, Sch Architecture Planning & Preservat, Urban Studies & Planning, College Pk, GA USA. [Gorska, Karolina] Los Angeles Dept City Planning, Urban Design Studio, Los Angeles, CA USA. [Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urban Planning, Los Angeles, CA USA. Zuk, M (reprint author), Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA. E-Mail: mzuk@berkeley.edu

摘要

Scholarly interest in the relationship between public investments and residential displacement dates back to the 1970s and the aftermath of displacement related to urban renewal. A new wave of scholarship examines the relationship of gentrification and displacement to public investment in transit infrastructure. Scholarship has generally conflated gentrification and displacement; however, this review argues for a clearer analytical distinction between the two. Although the displacement discussion in the United States began with the role of the public sector and now has returned to the same focus, it will be necessary to overcome methodological shortcomings to arrive at more definitive conclusions about the relationship.