打印

作者

来源

HOUSING POLICY DEBATE,Vol.28,Issue1SI,P.79-93

语言

英文

关键字

Informal settlements; urban entrepreneurialism; redevelopment; urban village; slum; favela; LOCAL-GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION; GLOBALIZING SHANGHAI; URBAN VILLAGES; MUMBAI; REDEVELOPMENT; CITY; ENTREPRENEURIALISM; RENEWAL; CITIES; LAND

作者单位

[Ren, Xuefei] Michigan State Univ, Sociol & Global Urban Studies, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA. Ren, XF (reprint author), Michigan State Univ, Sociol & Global Urban Studies, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA. E-Mail: renxuefe@msu.edu

摘要

Informal settlements in cities in the global South have been increasingly targeted for redevelopment led by public-private coalitions, especially if they are in central locations. Previous scholarship often characterizes housing policies targeting informal settlements as examples of entrepreneurial governance geared toward recapturing land value by private and public elites. This understanding, however, glosses over the disparate policy choices that local governments use to address informal settlements. This article proposes an analytical framework to explain the variations in policy responses to informal settlements, and it argues that the various policy initiatives are largely shaped by four factors-intergovernmental relations, electoral politics, municipal finance, and the capacity of the civil society. With examples from China, India, and Brazil, this study comparatively examines how these forces have produced distinct informal housing policies, such as urban village removal in Guangzhou, slum rehabilitation in Mumbai, and favela upgrading in Rio de Janeiro.