打印

作者

来源

JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS,Vol.40,Issue7,P.937-951

语言

英文

关键字

CLIMATE-CHANGE; NORTHERN POWERHOUSE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; LOCAL-GOVERNMENT; UK; URBAN; GOVERNANCE; CITY; POLITICS; SUSTAINABILITY

作者单位

[Cauvain, Jenni] Univ Nottingham, Sch Sociol & Social Policy, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England. [Karvonen, Andrew] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Urban & Reg Studies, Stockholm, Sweden. [Petrova, Saska] Univ Manchester, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Human Geog, Manchester, Lancs, England. Cauvain, J (reprint author), Univ Nottingham, Sch Sociol & Social Policy, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England. E-Mail: jenni.cauvain@nottingham.ac.uk

摘要

In recent years, social housing providers in the UK have become influential actors in realizing the national government's decarborization agenda. However, when decarbonization is considered in light of austerity measures and the privatization of public housing, a number of contradictions arise. From interviews and a workshop with policymakers and registered providers in the city-region of Greater Manchester, three tensions are highlighted. First, since the 1980s, the housing stock condition has been used as a political pawn in successive reforms to demunicipalize social housing. Second, local authorities continue to harness the collectivities that remain in the social housing sector to realize their decarbonization goals. Third, the retrofit practices of social landlords are only superficially aiming for carbon control; instead, they focus on the social aims that are seen as important to the ethos and business model of the landlord. The article concludes that there are unavoidable conflicts between the interests of different actors whose low-carbon economy is conceived at different spatial scales and with different underlying objectives. As social landlords are foregrounded in subregional low-carbon policy, they are effectively co-opted into market-based retrofit, resulting in unintended consequences for the social housing sector.