《Disentangling property value impacts of environmental contamination from locally undesirable land uses: Implications for measuring post-cleanup stigma》

打印
作者
来源
来源 JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS,Vol.93,P.85-98
语言
英文
关键字
Hazardous waste sites;Environmental contamination;Hedonic models;Residential property values;Stigma
作者单位
Center for Environmental and Resource Economic Policy and Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 8109, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA;Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin, 416 Taylor Hall, Madison, WI 53706, USA;Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee, Morgan Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA;Center for Environmental and Resource Economic Policy and Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 8109, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA;Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin, 416 Taylor Hall, Madison, WI 53706, USA;Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Tennessee, Morgan Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
摘要
This research seeks to identify the impact of environmental contamination on residential housing prices separate from land use externalities associated with the contaminated sites. This is possible in an empirical model that considers the influence of uncontaminated commercial properties on home values concurrently with contaminated property influences. Our approach addresses an important source of omitted variable bias that has not been fully recognized in the literature, and it allows identification of stigma effects in a way not possible in past studies. We estimate difference-in-differences models that pool observations across a metro area and across time, as well as repeat sales models that rely on multiple transactions per home. Results indicate that environmental contamination more than doubles the negative influence commercial properties have on neighboring residential home values. Furthermore, we find little evidence of stigma effects once a contaminated site is remediated. The negative spillover effects associated with remediated contaminated sites are largely indistinguishable from the spillover effects from commercial properties with no known contamination.