打印

作者

Libang Ma;Shichun Liu;Tianmin Tao;Min Gong;Jing Bai

来源

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL,Vol.126,P.102614

语言

英文

关键字

作者单位

College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, 730000, China;Key Laboratory of Resource Environment and Sustainable Development of Oasis, Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730070, China;Institute of Urban and Rural Development and Collaborative Governance of Northwest, Lanzhou, 730070, China;College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, 730000, China;Key Laboratory of Resource Environment and Sustainable Development of Oasis, Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730070, China;Institute of Urban and Rural Development and Collaborative Governance of Northwest, Lanzhou, 730070, China;School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China;Shanghai Key Laboratory of Urban Renewal and Spatial Optimization Technology, PR China;International Research Center for Architectural Heritage Conservation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China;Department of Construction and Real Estate, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210018, China;Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK;Tongji University (CAUP) Shanghai, China;TU Delft Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft, the Netherlands;College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, No.105 West 3rd Ring Road North, Beijing, 100048, China;College of Applied Arts and Sciences, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China;Laboratory of Urban Cultural Sensing & Computing, Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100191, China;Beijing Municipal Institute of City Planning and Design, Beijing, 100045, China;Tourism College of Beijing Union University, Beijing, 100101, China;State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China;School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023, China;Center for Real Estate Studying, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China;Department of Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China;Ningbo Urban Construction Investment Holding Company Limited, China;The Hongkong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China;Key Laboratory of Geographical Processes and Ecological Security in Changbai Mountains, Ministry of Education, School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130024, China;Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China;College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China;School of Architecture & Fine Art, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, 116000, China;School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin, 130024, China;College of Jang Ho Architecture, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

摘要

The spatial reconstruction of rural settlements is one of the important methods for coordinating the relationship between people and land in rural areas and promoting rural revitalization. Based on the theoretical framework of rural settlement space reconstruction from the perspective of rural livability and population flow, this paper took Longxi County in the loess hilly region of Longzhong in China as an example. Based on cross-sectional survey data of 213 administrative villages in 2020 as evaluation units, we analyzed rural livability and population flow intensity, and identified the types of rural settlement spatial reconstruction. The results show that: (1) The spatial differences in the rural natural environment, residential environment, economic and social environment, and overall livability of Longxi County were significant. They have significant river and road directivity. The livability of villages along the river in the middle of mountain area was better than that of villages along the hilly and mountainous in the south and northwest; (2) The population flow of Longxi County was classified into three types: cross-regional population flow, population flow within the county and population flow within the town. The trend of cross-regional population flow is significant. However, the activity of cross-regional population flow was not high, mainly with low and medium levels. The villages with strong population flow were also highly integrated, and vice versa; (3) Based on the evaluation results of rural livability and population flow, we divided the 213 administrative villages into four types of reconstruction: agglomeration and promotion type, potential advantage type, restricted expansion type, and layout optimization type. Then, we optimized and reconstructed them according to local conditions This paper provides a scientific basis for the spatial reconstruction of rural settlements in the loess hilly region of Longzhong in China. In addition, it provides a theoretical reference for coordinating the relationship between people and land, and realizing rural revitalization.