打印

作者

Dezhi Li;Qianli Xiong;Guanying Huang;Bingzhen Du;Haibo Feng

来源

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL,Vol.126,P.102611

语言

英文

关键字

作者单位

Department of Construction and Real Estate, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210018, China;Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK;Department of Construction and Real Estate, School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210018, China;Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK;Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;Department of Geoinformatics and Surveying, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;Department of Management, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria;School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, 210023, China;Key Laboratory of Coastal Zone Exploitation and Protection, Ministry of Natural Resources, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, 210023, China;Natural Resources Research Center, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, 210023, China;School of Civil Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, 159 Longpan Avenue, Xuanwu District, Nanjing, 210037, China;Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China;School of Sociology and Ethnology, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, 102488, China;Department of Public Policy, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China;Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518057, China;School of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China;Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China;School of Government, Peking University, Beijing, China;School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China;Center for the Promotion of Social Data Science Education and Research, Hitotsubashi University, 2-1, Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo, 186-8601, Japan;Department of Urban Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan

摘要

Old community renewal project (OCRP) is an important part of urban regeneration and can solve some of the problems caused by rapid urbanization. The diverse stakeholders involved in OCRP often have conflicts due to unclear benefits sharing, which hinders the progress of the transformation. Based on the Shapley Value method, this paper added three correction factors of ‘policy support’, ‘cooperative relationship’ and ‘development space’ to establish a benefit sharing model of OCRP. Then, a case study was conducted in the end to validate the model. The results of the case showed that the actual main beneficiaries are enterprises and governments. Benefits sharing under the enterprises-led OCRP implementation mode is more balanced. The results indicate that the model can be used to quantify benefits sharing of OCRP in China and reduce conflicts among stakeholders, thereby promoting OCRP smoothly. This study provides a model to compare the sustainability of different modes of OCRP in China and other economies.