《How do urban park features affect cultural ecosystem services: Quantified evidence for design practices》

打印
作者
Yanan Wang;Xiaoxiao Shi;Kejun Cheng;Jingke Zhang;Qing Chang
来源
URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING,Vol.76,Issue1,Article 127713
语言
英文
关键字
作者单位
Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Horticulture, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland;School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, King’s College, Aberdeen AB24 3FX Scotland, UK;School of Architecture and Design, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China;Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia;Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;Movement and Nutrition for Health and Performance Research Group, Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium;Short communication"}]},{"#name":"title","$":{"id":"tit0005"},"_":"Adolescents’ perceptions of park characteristics that discourage park visitation"}],"floats":[],"footnotes":[],"attachments":[]},"openArchive":false,"openAccess":false,"document-subtype":"sco","content-family":"serial","contentType":"JL","abstract":{"$$":[{"$$":[{"$":{"id":"sect0005"},"#name":"section-title","_":"Abstract"},{"$$":[{"$":{"view":"all","id":"sp0040"},"#name":"simple-para","_":"Parks are key amenities of liveable cities that support physical activity and social interaction. However, parks are often not well attended by adolescents, and little is known about what park characteristics may discourage adolescents from visiting parks. The aim of this study was to explore what park characteristics adolescents perceive as most likely to discourage park visitation. Adolescents (n = 444, 13–18 years, 53% female) from seven schools in diverse areas of Melbourne, Australia completed an online survey at school. In response to an open-ended question, participants listed three park characteristics that would most likely discourage their park visitation. Content analysis was performed to determine categories of park characteristics from the coded responses. The six most frequently stated park characteristics that would discourage park visitation related to: play equipment (e.g., small/children’s playgrounds, no play equipment, no swings; 44% of participants mentioned the category at least once); social factors (e.g., crowded parks, presence of undesirable people; 32%); natural environment (e.g., small/no grassy space, large grassy open space; 28%); maintenance (e.g., dirty facilities, rubbish; 23%); sport/recreation features (e.g., skate park; 20%); and amenities (e.g., no shade, toilets, drink taps; 19%). To encourage more adolescents to increasingly visit parks, it is imperative for stakeholders to address the park features that they perceive as unappealing to ensure that park design caters to this important age group."}],"$":{"view":"all","id":"abs0010"},"#name":"abstract-sec"}],"$":{"view":"all","id":"ab0010","class":"author"},"#name":"abstract"}],"$":{"xmlns:ce":true,"xmlns:dm":true,"xmlns:sb":true},"#name":"abstracts"},"pdf":{"urlType":"download","url":"/science/article/pii/S1618866722002126/pdfft?md5=f884e81de81ce1765f494bbd7d55b6a2&pid=1-s2.0-S1618866722002126-main.pdf"},"iss-first":"","vol-first":"74","isThirdParty":false,"issn-primary-unformatted":"16188667","issn-primary-formatted":"1618-8667"},{"pii":"S0169204622001682","journalTitle":"Landscape and Urban Planning","publicationYear":"2022","publicationDate":"2022-11-01","volumeSupText":"Volume 227","articleNumber":"104519","pageRange":"104519","trace-token":"AAAAQL38WiyCJeSn3MhPRsMytRfpZGZJsSu3CSFw5YGF6OwlsVMNvxBoKPHLDvWMB50lduTELsuCJWbRh1Lz1brwdzGKzfzZgf-IjEk1MkK8auXcvYas8g","authors":{"content":[{"#name":"author-group","$":{"id":"ag005"},"$$":[{"#name":"author","$":{"id":"au005","author-id":"S0169204622001682-bdada483653af00d29330e25c6e50987"},"$$":[{"#name":"given-name","_":"Carl;Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Ecology, SLU Instutitionen för ekologi, Ulls väg 16, 756 51 Uppsala, Sweden;Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development, Sweden;James Hutton Institute, Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK;Department of Rural Economy, Environment & Society, Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Peter Wilson Building, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland, UK;Original article"}]},{"#name":"title","$":{"id":"tit0005"},"_":"Urban residents value multi-functional urban greenspaces"}],"floats":[],"footnotes":[],"attachments":[]},"openArchive":false,"openAccess":true,"document-subtype":"fla","content-family":"serial","contentType":"JL","abstract":{"$$":[{"$$":[{"$":{"id":"sect0005"},"#name":"section-title","_":"Abstract"},{"$$":[{"$":{"view":"all","id":"sp0105"},"#name":"simple-para","_":"Urban greenspaces are multifunctional spaces, providing services to people and biodiversity. With space in urban areas being limited creation and maintenance of urban greenspaces relies on understanding the preferences of urban residents for their characteristics. Such preferences are expected to vary with current availability, and the availability of alternatives to greenspaces such as gardens or gyms. We carried out a nationwide discrete choice experiment with Scottish urban residents to estimate values associated with greenspace attributes of: recreational features; plants and natural features; trees; accessibility; time to walk from home and size, to test the hypotheses that: (i) people are willing to pay to maintain greenspace, (ii) people have willingness to pay for greenspaces with multiple functions, including features for direct use (e.g. play equipment) and biodiversity (e.g. wildflowers), (iii) willingness to pay for individual greenspace will vary according to socioeconomic characteristics and (iv) vary with the amount of greenspace or substitute facilities available. We find a positive willingness to pay to maintain greenspace in general, and higher willingness to pay for larger greenspaces closer to home, which are multifunctional and contain both direct use features (e.g. children’s play park) and biodiversity features. Although we find significant heterogeneity in willingness to pay for maintaining greenspace, this is not well explained by either socioeconomic characteristics or the availability of substitute facilities. Our results have relevance for urban natural capital accounting, and demonstrate to urban planners the importance of the design and maintenance of multi-functional greenspaces for urban populations and would benefit from future research that further explores heterogeneity, including perceptions of greenspace access and substitutes, and greenspace quality."}],"$":{"view":"all","id":"abs0010"},"#name":"abstract-sec"}],"$":{"view":"all","id":"ab0010","class":"author"},"#name":"abstract"}],"$":{"xmlns:ce":true,"xmlns:dm":true,"xmlns:sb":true},"#name":"abstracts"},"pdf":{"urlType":"download","url":"/science/article/pii/S1618866722002242/pdfft?md5=78efe035418ee17d8aa1c35913ed1bc2&pid=1-s2.0-S1618866722002242-main.pdf"},"iss-first":"","vol-first":"74","isThirdParty":false,"issn-primary-unformatted":"16188667","issn-primary-formatted":"1618-8667"},{"pii":"S1618866722002060","journalTitle":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","publicationYear":"2022","publicationDate":"2022-08-01","volumeSupText":"Volume 74","articleNumber":"127663","pageRange":"127663","trace-token":"AAAAQL38WiyCJeSn3MhPRsMytReavO9dht-e7ptdvxVWTW7-nw3dkrOYrzRBtp2BJa7vCtbMo19tLbJ9MIdE5kOp5dK0FZ84dN4fHPgMZtCs0koDFFCnDA","authors":{"content":[{"#name":"author-group","$":{"id":"ag0005"},"$$":[{"#name":"author","$":{"id":"au0005","author-id":"S1618866722002060-fad903212c57ddb937117f58b04bf591"},"$$":[{"#name":"given-name","_":"Iwona;Department of Integrated Geography, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland;Department of Geography, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany;School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland;Editorial"}]},{"#name":"title","$":{"id":"tit0005"},"_":"Urban transitions towards Nature-based Solutions"}],"floats":[],"footnotes":[],"attachments":[]},"openArchive":false,"openAccess":false,"document-subtype":"edi","content-family":"serial","contentType":"JL","abstract":{},"pdf":{"urlType":"download","url":"/science/article/pii/S1618866722002060/pdfft?md5=f1c2ecd5b9648f9209ec3dff19de34dc&pid=1-s2.0-S1618866722002060-main.pdf"},"iss-first":"","vol-first":"74","isThirdParty":false,"issn-primary-unformatted":"16188667","issn-primary-formatted":"1618-8667"}]},"references":{"content":[{"#name":"bibliography","$":{"xmlns:ce":true,"xmlns:aep":true,"xmlns:mml":true,"xmlns:xs":true,"xmlns:xlink":true,"xmlns:xocs":true,"xmlns:tb":true,"xmlns:xsi":true,"xmlns:cals":true,"xmlns:sb":true,"xmlns:sa":true,"xmlns:ja":true,"xmlns":true,"id":"bibliog0005","view":"all"},"$$":[{"#name":"section-title","$":{"id":"sect0175"},"_":"References
摘要
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) in urban parks are associated with nature contact willingness and health outcomes of urban residents. However, practical knowledge on how to manage urban park features to enhance CES is still lacking, especially on more detailed scales. This study developed a practice-oriented workflow for exploring design-related indicators that affect CES by considering four aspects of urban park features, including distance to elements, density of elements, land cover proportion, and landscape diversity. Then the workflow was implemented in a case study by taking six urban parks in Beijing as study areas. Three CES types were identified with outdoor social media images, including recreation value, aesthetic value, and social interaction value. Statistical analyses indicated that a combination of the four aspects of urban park features within a specific service radius was the most significant factor in explaining CES. The importance of design-related indicators for enhancing different CES types was also identified. Density of facilities, proportion of tree canopy-shaded ground, and richness of land cover types were proved important for all the three CES types and therefore could be concerned in urban park design practices. Based on these findings, this study further proposed landscape site design strategies and three adaptive design cases for enhancing different CES types, which could provide evidence-based and practical solutions for managers and landscape architects.