打印

作者

Martin Oteng-Ababio;Richard Grant

来源

HABITAT INTERNATIONAL,Vol.83,P.1-10

语言

英文

关键字

Neoliberalism;Rights to the city;Sustainable development;Informal settlement;Agbogbloshie;Accra

作者单位

Department of Geography and Resource Development, P.O Box LG59, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana;Department of Geography and Regional Studies, 115R Campo Sano Building, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA;Department of Geography, Environment Management & Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa;Department of Geography and Resource Development, P.O Box LG59, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana;Department of Geography and Regional Studies, 115R Campo Sano Building, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, USA;Department of Geography, Environment Management & Energy Studies, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

摘要

Neoliberalism, rights to the city, and sustainable development are systems of ideas competing for the attention of policymakers and citizens worldwide. Analyzing Ghana's key urban reports, we produce a heat map of the intensity and fragility of ideas concerning the urban poor. We employ the Agbogbloshie informal settlement as a case study to explore conflicts among diverse planning goals: urban entrepreneurialism, environmental protection, formalization of parts of the informal economy, the reframing of citizenship, and settlement upgrading. Decongestion exercises, shack demolitions, and threats of relocation are strategies employed to restore order, but the settlement's regeneration is beset by transience and piecemeal actions. We introduce hypocrisy as a theoretical analytical perspective to call into question pro-poor urban planning interventions as a way of responding to continuous ambivalent planning measures and framing. Hypocrisy prompts an alternative focus on inconsistencies and contradictions in the planning system.