What spatially stabilises temporary use? A qualitative comparative analysis of 40 temporary use cases along synchronised trajectories of stabilisation

《What spatially stabilises temporary use? A qualitative comparative analysis of 40 temporary use cases along synchronised trajectories of stabilisation》

打印

关键字: Temporary use;Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fs-QCA);Spatial stabilisation;Entrepreneurial management;Risk perceptiveness;Urban regeneration

作者单位: Chair of Planning Theory and Urban Development, Faculty of Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben 55, 52056 Aachen, NRW, Germany;Erasmus University Rotterdam, Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies, P.O. Box 1935, 3000 BX Rotterdam, the Netherlands;Chair of Planning Theory and Urban Development, Faculty of Architecture, RWTH Aachen University, Templergraben 55, 52056 Aachen, NRW, Germany;Erasmus University Rotterdam, Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies, P.O. Box 1935, 3000 BX Rotterdam, the Netherlands

摘要: As Temporary Uses (TU) proliferate in praxis, scholarship intensifies its attention to TU contexts and conditions, too. Until now, much of this attention derives from single-case studies of TU with little awareness for the persistent, cross-case conditions that stabilise TU. This paper addresses this gap by assessing under what combination of the most common conditions TU stabilises in space and becomes fixed to a single location. These include entrepreneurial management, risk perceptiveness, adaptive capacity, interactive attachment, municipal support, spatial affordance, and functional compatibility. By drawing on empirical data collected between 2017 and 2019 from 40 different TU cases in the Bremen (DE) and Rotterdam (NL), as well as document analyses, we present and discuss the outcomes of a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fs-QCA). Our analysis problematises and prioritises how entrepreneurial management and risk perceptiveness interact and contribute to the spatial stability of TU. Two sets of pathways of conjunctions are highlighted in this contribution. The first relates to entrepreneurial management that is empowered by municipal support in facilitating functional compatibility. The latter relates to risk perceptiveness along with adaptive capacity that can be incubated through spatial affordances. These pathways of stabilisation associate with synchronised trajectories of TU.