《Is the green inequality overestimated? Quality reevaluation of green space accessibility》

打印
作者
Jiayu Wu;Yisong Peng;Ping Liu;Yubing Weng;Jian Lin
来源
CITIES,Vol.130,Issue1,Article 103871
语言
英文
关键字
Green justice;Green space quality;Urban green space;Comprehensive floating catchment area model (CFCA)
作者单位
College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang Province, PR China;The Architectural Design & Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co., Ltd., Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, Zhejiang Province, PR China;Department of Land Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, PR China;Center for Balanced Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang Province, PR China;Zhejiang Urban and Rural Planning Design Institute, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang Province, PR China;Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China;College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang Province, PR China;The Architectural Design & Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co., Ltd., Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, Zhejiang Province, PR China;Department of Land Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou 310058, PR China;Center for Balanced Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang Province, PR China;Zhejiang Urban and Rural Planning Design Institute, Hangzhou 310007, Zhejiang Province, PR China;Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China
摘要
Although urban green space (UGS) is an important factor in improving the well-being of residents, the problem of green injustice has been proven to be prevalent. Balancing the quantity distribution of UGS is an important way to solve the problem, but the effect is declining owing to many reasons. The general lack of evaluation of UGS quality in accessibility model leads to the insufficient understanding of real inequality and the inability to excavate strategies from the level of quality. Accordingly, this article first established an evaluation system for the serviceability of UGS (including size, outerconnectivity, inner-connectivity, diversity, eco-serviceability, and compactness). Based on the comprehensive floating catchment area method, the spatial distribution patterns and inequality differences of UGS quantity and quality accessibility under three traffic modes are compared. The results show that evaluating the quantity inequality of UGS may lead to overestimation of real inequality, and other functional advantages can offset the quantitative disadvantages. The government-led quality improvement intervention and the policy of enhancing residents' transportation capacity can alleviate green inequality. The finding confirms the significance of serviceability in improving green equity and provides guidance for government leaders and researchers on the development of UGS in the future.