打印

作者

Han Li;Yehua Dennis Wei;Yangyi Wu;Guang Tian

来源

CITIES,Vol.91,Issue1,Pages 165-179

语言

英文

关键字

Housing price;Hedonic model;Amenity;Open data;Shanghai

作者单位

Department of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA;Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9155, USA;Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China;Department of Planning and Urban Studies, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA;Department of Geography and Regional Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA;Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9155, USA;Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China;Department of Planning and Urban Studies, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA

摘要

Skyrocketing housing prices in China's megacities have generated broad concerns. By integrating open data from Lianjia.com, Dianping.com, Mobike.com, and Baidu Map POI, we analyze spatial patterns of apartment prices and their association with local attributes in Shanghai. We find that Shanghai's residential market still has a monocentric structure because of the centralized distribution of public transport facilities and amenities. Hedonic models further confirm that structural attributes, accessibility, as well as public and private service amenities significantly shape the real estate market. These factors also are differentiated so as to form a pattern of concentric rings. In the inner-city and expanded inner-city areas, public service amenities such as parks, schools, hospitals, and banks, as well as private service amenities such as entertainment, shopping, and residential service facilities, boost housing prices. In the suburbs, better access to bike sharing, bus stops, and metro stations are the top preferences for apartment buyers. Our study also indicates that the Chinese government needs to make public and private services more accessible, not only spatially in urban peripheries and villages, but also institutionally to lower income families who cannot afford apartments in expensive neighborhoods.