打印

中文标题

城市规划政策评估的非补偿性综合指标：土地利用政策效率指数（LUPEI）

作者

来源

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH,P.491-507

语言

英文

关键字

(S) Multiple-Criteria Analysis; (S) Decision Support Systems; Composite indicators; ELECTRE methods; Land-use change; Land-use policy; LANDSCAPE METRICS; ELECTRE-III; SPATIAL INDICATORS; SUSTAINABILITY; FRAGMENTATION; MANAGEMENT; CRITERIA; CITY; EXTENSION

作者单位

[Attardi, Raffaele; Torre, Carmelo Maria] Polytech Bari, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Bari, Italy. [Cerreta, Maria; Sannicandro, Valentina] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Architecture, Naples, Italy. Attardi, R (reprint author), Polytech Bari, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Bari, Italy. E-Mail: raffaeleattardi@gmail.com

标签

城市规划,土地利用,城市景观 | 其他

摘要

In this research paper, we define and test an ELECTRE III-based approach to the construction of non compensatory composite indicators; these indicators are used for the evaluation of environmental and social performances of urban and regional planning policies. We tested the methodology for the construction of the Land-Use Policy Efficiency Index (LUPEI) on the municipal scale applied to a sample of municipalities in the Apulia Region (Southern Italy). Based on the literature review concerning composite indicators, we found that linear aggregation rules are the most widely applied aggregation procedures for composite indicators. However, their applicability depends on a set of strong theoretical and operational conditions. If these conditions do not hold, then other aggregation and weighting procedures must be applied to construct the composite indicators. We tested the ELECTRE III via a fruitful interaction with three experts who were participating in a focus group. We found that composite indicators are powerful tools when it comes to the assessment of multidimensional planning issues. Since each sub-indicator provides different information and responds to different goals, rankings and assessment based on mono-indicator frameworks can lead to incomplete or even biased results that do not consider an integrated approach to land-use policy efficiency. Moreover, both experts and decision-makers appreciated the role of composite indicators in increasing knowledge and providing deeper insights into complex phenomeria in the domains of urban and regional planning. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 在本研究论文中，我们定义并测试了基于ELECTRE III方法的非补偿性复合指标构建方法；这些指标被用于评估城市和区域规划政策的环境效用和社会绩效。我们将土地利用政策效率指数（LUPEI）的构建方法用于城市级别上的阿普利亚地区（意大利南部）的样本城市。基于有关复合指标的文献综述，我们发现线性聚合规则是复合指标最广泛应用的聚合程序。但是，它们的适用性取决于一系列强大的理论和操作条件。如果这些条件不成立，则必须应用其他聚合和加权程序来构建复合指标。我们通过与参与专门小组的三位专家的富有成效的互动测试了ELECTRE III方法。我们发现，复合指标是评估多维规划问题的有力工具。由于每个子指标提供不同的信息并响应不同的目标，基于单指标框架的排名和评估可能导致不完整甚至有偏见的结果，这种结果不能提供对土地利用政策效率的综合性呈现。此外，专家和决策者都认识到，综合指标能够帮助增进情况了解，并对城市和区域规划领域的复杂现象提供更深入的见解。（C）2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。